++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The Porsche 981 Cayman S is faster — 0.4s quicker on average across 8 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | Porsche 981 Cayman S 981 Cayman S | Hyundai Ioniq 5 N Ioniq 5 N |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2013-2016 | 2023-2025 |
| horsepower | 325 | 641 |
| torque (N_M) | 369 | 568 |
| weight (KG) | 1,320 | 2,223 |
| Power to Weight | 0.25 | 0.29 |
| Rank | #128 | #187 |
| Tire |
220 P-ZERO
235/40/19 / 265/40/19 |
80 P-ZERO CORSA (PZC4)
255/45/20 |
| engine Description | 3.4L NA flat-6 (MA1) | Dual electric motors, 84 kWh |
| gearbox | 6-SPEED MANUAL | F/R: DIRECT-DRIVE |
| drive Type | RWD | AWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2474 | 3000 |
| width (MM) | 1801 | 1941 |
| length (MM) | 4379 | 4714 |
| height (MM) | 1295 | 1585 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 5 SECs | 3.1 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 283 | 261 |
| price MSRP | $ 64,750 | $ 70,000 |
| Current Value | $ 55,000 | $ 62,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | -1.92s | -0.09s |
Porsche 981 Cayman S 981 Cayman S — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | 981 Cayman S 981 Caym… | Ioniq 5 N Ioniq 5… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laguna Seca (Current) | 1:42 | 1:40.961 | +1.03 | Light | >200 | |
| Pacific Raceways (CCW) | 1:35.4 | 1:31.96 | +3.44 | Stock | >200 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Buttonwillow Raceway (13CW) | 1:59.6 | 1:58.07 | +1.53 | Medium | 141–200 | ▶ VS ▶ |
Additional Lap Times
| Track Name | 981 Cayman S 981 Caym… | Ioniq 5 N Ioniq 5… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laguna Seca (Current) | 1:39.29 | 1:40.961 | -1.67 | Med / Light | 200 / 220 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Ridge Motorsports Park (Current) | 1:46.47 | 1:50 | -3.53 | Med / Stock | 100 / 220 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Pacific Raceways (CCW) | 1:28.13 | 1:31.96 | -3.83 | Med / Stock | 100 / 220 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Buttonwillow Raceway (13CW) | 1:59.6 | 1:57.51 | +2.09 | Med / Med | 200 / 100 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Pocono Raceway (North Road Course-CW) | 0:59.9 | 0:57.815 | +2.08 | Med / Stock | 200 / 300 |
Compare to
Comments