++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The Porsche 981 Cayman S is faster — 49.3s quicker on average across 3 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | Porsche 981 Cayman S 981 Cayman S | Suzuki Swift Sport ZC32S Swift Sport ZC32S |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2013-2016 | 2010-2018 |
| horsepower | 325 | 134 |
| torque (N_M) | 369 | 160 |
| weight (KG) | 1,320 | 1,050 |
| Power to Weight | 0.25 | 0.13 |
| Rank | #137 | #263 |
| Tire |
220 P-ZERO
235/40/19 / 265/40/19 |
140 R050
195/45/17 |
| engine Description | 3.4L NA flat-6 (MA1) | 1.6 L M16A I4 (ZC32S) |
| gearbox | 6-SPEED MANUAL | 6-SPEED MANUAL |
| drive Type | RWD | FWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2474 | 2431 |
| width (MM) | 1801 | 1694 |
| length (MM) | 4379 | 3889 |
| height (MM) | 1295 | 1509 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 5 SECs | 7.2 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 283 | 209 |
| price MSRP | $ 64,750 | 20,070 € |
| Current Value | $ 58,000 | $ 14,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | -1.69s | +7.27s |
Porsche 981 Cayman S 981 Cayman S — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | 981 Cayman S 981 Caym… | Swift Sport ZC32S Swift Sp… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nürburgring (BTG) | 7:19.836 | 8:40 | -1:20.16 | Heavy / Race | 180 / 200 |
Compare to
Comments