++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The Hyundai i20N is faster — 10.7s quicker on average across 5 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | Renault Clio Sport 172 Clio Sport 172 | Hyundai i20N i20N |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2001-2004 | 1901-2024 |
| horsepower | 170 | 204 |
| torque (N_M) | 148 | 274 |
| weight (KG) | 1,035 | 1,220 |
| Power to Weight | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Rank | #277 | #280 |
| Tire | 240 PILOT EXALTO PE2 |
220 P-ZERO
215/40/18 |
| engine Description | 2.0 16V Sport (CB0M) (169 Hp) | 1.6L turbo I4 (Theta) |
| gearbox | 5-SPEED MANUAL | 6-SPEED MANUAL |
| drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2588 | 2580 |
| width (MM) | 1638 | 1775 |
| length (MM) | 3810 | 4075 |
| height (MM) | 1410 | 1440 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 7.2 SECs | 6.4 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 220 | 229 |
| price MSRP | 15,995 € | $ 33,490 |
| Current Value | $ 10,000 | $ 29,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | +8.94s | +5.65s |
Renault Clio Sport 172 Clio Sport 172 — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | Clio Sport 172 Clio Spo… | i20N i20N | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wakefield Park Raceway (Full CW) | 1:13.04 | 1:10.15 | +2.89 | Med / Stock | 200 / 220 | |
| Luddenham Raceway (CW) | 0:54.51 | 0:55.16 | -0.65 | Med / Stock | 100 / 220 |
Compare to
Comments