++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The Nissan 200SX S14 is faster — 3.8s quicker on average across 4 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | Toyota MR2 W20 MR2 W20 | Nissan 200SX S14 200SX S14 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 1989-1999 | 1995-1998 |
| horsepower | 200 | 197 |
| torque (N_M) | 197 | 264 |
| weight (KG) | 1,155 | 1,240 |
| Power to Weight | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Rank | #82 | - |
| Tire | 200 POTENZA RE-71RS | 200 POTENZA RE-71RS |
| engine Description | 2.0L 3S-GTE turbocharged inline-four | 2.0L NA I4 (SR20DE ) |
| gearbox | 5-SPEED MANUAL | 5-SPEED MANUAL |
| drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2400 | 2520 |
| width (MM) | 1699 | 1730 |
| length (MM) | 4181 | 4520 |
| height (MM) | 1240 | 1300 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 7.9 SECs | 7.5 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 220 | 235 |
| price MSRP | $ 24,728 | $ 26,000 |
| Current Value | $ 25,000 | $ 21,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | -0.32s | +0.73s |
Toyota MR2 W20 MR2 W20 — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | MR2 W20 MR2 W20 | 200SX S14 200SX S1… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luddenham Raceway (CW) | 0:55.7 | 0:57.576 | -1.87 | Heavy / Med | 200 / 200 |
Compare to
Comments