The Nissan 370Z Nismo is faster — 4.4s quicker on average across 7 shared tracks.
Nissan 370Z Nismo vs Honda Acura Integra Type S: Two Approaches to Accessible Performance
When you pit the Nissan 370Z Nismo against the Honda Acura Integra Type S, you’re not just comparing two cars—you’re comparing two philosophies on what makes a trackday hero. The 370Z Nismo brings classic rear-wheel-drive coupe energy with a naturally aspirated V6, while the Integra Type S puts a turbocharged punch through the front wheels. Both have strong grassroots followings, but their performance data from LapMeta.com reveals fascinating contrasts and a few surprises on the stopwatch.
Head-to-Head Lap Time Battles
Looking at shared tracks, the lap times tell a story of momentum swings and circuit-dependent strengths. At MSR Houston - CW, the 370Z Nismo stretches its legs, clocking a 1:37.871 (race mod), a full 14.7 seconds quicker than the Integra Type S’s 1:52.6 (medium mod). That’s a huge gap, likely owing to the Z’s greater power and rear-drive traction on a circuit that rewards acceleration and lateral grip.
But the script flips dramatically at Sonoma Raceway - Long. Here, the Integra Type S surprises, setting a 1:49 (medium mod) and besting the Z’s 1:56.146 (light mod) by an emphatic 7.1 seconds. Sonoma’s technical, twisty nature and the Type S’s lighter chassis and turbo torque seem to pay dividends.
At Virginia International Raceway - Full Course, the Nismo reasserts itself with a 2:08.322 (medium mod), 4.2 seconds clear of the Integra’s 2:12.55 (light mod). The power and balance of the Z shine through on VIR’s combination of high-speed and technical sections.
Even in stock form, the results are a mixed bag. On Dunnville Autodrome - CW, the Integra Type S turns the tables with a 1:13.55, outpacing the Z’s 1:17 by about 3.5 seconds. But on Thunderhill - West, the 370Z Nismo claws back the advantage, registering a 1:25.19 to the Integra’s 1:26.64, a margin of 1.45 seconds.
Engineering, Driving Experience, and Value
The Nissan 370Z Nismo is every bit the purist’s coupe, with a naturally aspirated V6, rear-wheel drive, and a curb weight of 3340 lbs. This platform is known for its robust reliability and rewarding dynamics—traits that shine in lap time data, especially at power tracks. Its -0.66% overall pace vs. LapMeta averages underscores its above-average speed in the hands of varied drivers. The Z is a car that responds dramatically to upgrades; in the right hands and with the right mods, it can punch above its weight.
The Honda Acura Integra Type S, on the other hand, is a new-school hot hatch sedan, turbocharged and putting down 320 PS and a meaty 420 Nm through the front wheels. At 3212 lbs, it’s lighter than the Z and packs a modern, flexible powerband. Its -0.52% pace vs. average hints that it’s no slouch, even if its LapMeta sample size is smaller. The Integra’s real-world pace—especially on tighter tracks—shows just how potent a well-executed FWD chassis can be. For drivers who value daily usability and cutting-edge tech, the Type S is a compelling proposition.
Neither car is a world-beater out of the box, but both offer a fantastic foundation for track day fun. The Nissan appeals to those who want rear-drive drama and classic coupe style, while the Integra Type S is for the driver who wants a modern turbocharged edge with everyday usability.
Conclusion: Two Paths to Enthusiast Joy
The data reveals that the Nissan 370Z Nismo and Honda Acura Integra Type S are neck-and-neck in real-world pace, each capable of surprising the other depending on the track and conditions. The Z Nismo’s high-speed stability and power reward committed drivers, while the Integra Type S’s turbo torque and agile chassis shine on technical layouts.
Ultimately, your choice comes down to driving style and priorities. Both are proof that the modern performance car landscape is richer for having both old-school and new-school icons sharing the same tarmac.
Specifications
| Specifications | Nissan 370Z Nismo 370Z Nismo | Honda Acura Integra Type S Acura Integra Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2009-2024 | 2024 |
| horsepower | 350 | 320 |
| torque (N_M) | 374 | 420 |
| weight (KG) | 1,515 | 1,457 |
| Power to Weight | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Rank | #176 | #182 |
| Tire |
240 ADVAN SPORT V105
225/50/18 / 245/45/18 |
320 PILOT SPORT 4
235/40/18 |
| engine Description | 3.7L NA V6 (VQ37VHR) | turbocharged and intercooled 16-valve inline-4 |
| gearbox | 6-SPEED MANUAL | 6-SPEED |
| drive Type | RWD | FWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2550 | 2736 |
| width (MM) | 1844 | 1900 |
| length (MM) | 4404 | 4724 |
| height (MM) | 1316 | 1407 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 5 SECs | 5.1 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 249 | 269 |
| price MSRP | $ 43,810 | $ 53,875 |
| Current Value | $ 28,000 | $ 48,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | +1.39s | +2.09s |
Nissan 370Z Nismo 370Z Nismo — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | 370Z Nismo 370Z Nis… | Acura Integra Type S Acura In… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunnville Autodrome (CW) | 1:17 | 1:13.55 | +3.45 | Stock | >200 |
Additional Lap Times
| Track Name | 370Z Nismo 370Z Nis… | Acura Integra Type S Acura In… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSR Houston (CW) | 1:37.871 | 1:52.6 | -14.72 | Race / Med | 40 / 320 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Virginia International Raceway - VIR (Full Course) | 2:08.322 | 2:12.55 | -4.22 | Med / Light | 40 / 200 | |
| Sonoma Raceway (Long) | 1:56.146 | 1:49 | +7.14 | Light / Med | 200 / 200 |