++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The Subaru BRZ is faster — 16.9s quicker on average across 6 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | Subaru BRZ BRZ | Renault Clio Sport 172 Clio Sport 172 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2012-2022 | 2001-2004 |
| horsepower | 197 | 170 |
| torque (N_M) | 205 | 148 |
| weight (KG) | 1,298 | 1,035 |
| Power to Weight | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Rank | #225 | #222 |
| Tire |
200 CR-S (CR-1)
215/45/17 |
240 PILOT EXALTO PE2 |
| engine Description | 2.0 L 4U-GSE/FA20 H4 | 2.0 16V Sport (CB0M) (169 Hp) |
| gearbox | 6-SPEED MANUAL | 5-SPEED MANUAL |
| drive Type | RWD | FWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2570 | 2588 |
| width (MM) | 1775 | 1638 |
| length (MM) | 4239 | 3810 |
| height (MM) | 1285 | 1410 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 6.2 SECs | 7.2 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 233 | 220 |
| price MSRP | $ 28,845 | 15,995 € |
| Current Value | $ 22,000 | $ 15,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | +3.74s | +8.83s |
Subaru BRZ BRZ — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | BRZ BRZ | Clio Sport 172 Clio Spo… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wakefield Park Raceway (Full CW) | 1:12 | 1:13.04 | -1.04 | Medium | 141–200 | |
| Luddenham Raceway (CW) | 0:53.84 | 0:54.51 | -0.67 | Medium | 100–140 |
Additional Lap Times
| Track Name | BRZ BRZ | Clio Sport 172 Clio Spo… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wakefield Park Raceway (Full CW) | 1:09.37 | 1:13.04 | -3.67 | Med / Med | 100 / 200 | |
| Luddenham Raceway (CW) | 0:56.3 | 0:54.51 | +1.79 | Med / Med | 200 / 100 |
Compare to
Comments