++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The BMW M2 F87 is faster — 1.7s quicker on average across 11 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | BMW M2 F87 M2 F87 | Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy-R Megane 4 RS Trophy-R |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2016-2020 | 2019-2023 |
| horsepower | 370 | 300 |
| torque (N_M) | 343 | 400 |
| forced Induction | Yes | Yes |
| weight (KG) | 1,495 | 1,312 |
| Power to Weight | 0.25 | 0.23 |
| Rank | #153 | #156 |
| Tire |
300 PILOT SUPER SPORT
255/35/19 / 265/35/19 |
240 POTENZA S007
245/35/19 |
| engine Description | 3.0L turbo I6 (N55B30T0) | 1.8L turbo I4 (M5M ) |
| gearbox | 6-SPEED MANUAL | 6-SPEED MANUAL |
| drive Type | RWD | FWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2692 | 2670 |
| width (MM) | 1854 | 1875 |
| length (MM) | 4475 | 4364 |
| height (MM) | 1410 | 1435 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 4 SECs | 5.2 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 249 | 262 |
| price MSRP | $ 53,495 | $ 74,990 |
| Current Value | $ 45,000 | $ 58,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | -0.32s | -0.72s |
BMW M2 F87 M2 F87 — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | M2 F87 M2 F87 | Megane 4 RS Trophy-R Megane 4… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silesia Ring (CW) | 1:57.8 | 1:56.6 | +1.2 | Medium | 141–200 |
Additional Lap Times
| Track Name | M2 F87 M2 F87 | Megane 4 RS Trophy-R Megane 4… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nürburgring (BTG) | 7:33 | 7:33 | -0 | Race / Med | 100 / 100 | |
| Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps (SPA) | 2:34.61 | 2:45.05 | -10.44 | Race / Stock | 200 / 240 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Silesia Ring (CW) | 1:57.8 | 1:56.5 | +1.3 | Med / Med | 180 / 100 | |
| Slovakia Ring (Config 4 CW) | 2:18.217 | 2:28.4 | -10.18 | Race / Light | 300 / 200 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Circuito de Alcarrás (CCW) | 1:49.6 | 1:55.2 | -5.6 | Med / Stock | 100 / 240 |
Compare to
Comments