++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The Caterham 7 CSR 260 is faster — 4.8s quicker on average across 6 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | BMW E46 M3 E46 M3 | Caterham 7 CSR 260 7 CSR 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2001-2006 | 2005-2010 |
| horsepower | 337 | 264 |
| torque (N_M) | 365 | 270 |
| weight (KG) | 1,470 | 570 |
| Power to Weight | 0.23 | 0.46 |
| Rank | #161 | - |
| Tire |
220 P ZERO ROSSO
235/35/19 / 265/30/19 |
100 CR500
195/45/15 / 255/40/15 |
| engine Description | 3.2L NA I6 (S54B32 ) | 2.3L NA I4 (Cosworth) |
| gearbox | 6 SPEED MANUAL | 6 SPEED MANUAL |
| drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2730 | 2315 |
| width (MM) | 1780 | 1533 |
| length (MM) | 4490 | 3300 |
| height (MM) | 1370 | 1140 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 4 SECs | 4 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 249 | 230 |
| price MSRP | $ 47,100 | 39,790 € |
| Current Value | $ 45,000 | $ 50,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | -0.4s | -9.31s |
BMW E46 M3 E46 M3 — Lap Times vs Average
Compare to
Comments