On paper, the Toyota GR Supra A90/A91 and BMW M2 G87 are siblings—both powered by a 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six, both rear-wheel drive, both conceived with track days and fast road work in mind. Yet, their shared DNA only underscores the divergent philosophies at play when you push each car to its limits. The Supra is the scalpel: lightweight, sharp, and engineered to reward the thoughtful driver. The M2 G87, in contrast, is a sledgehammer of the modern M ethos—a heavier, more powerful brute, bristling with technology and torque, determined to dominate through sheer force.
This divergence becomes immediately apparent in the data. Consider the Nürburgring Nordschleife, the ultimate test of chassis, composure, and power deployment. The M2 G87, with its 453 PS S58 engine and a raft of upgrades, delivers a blistering 7:23.16, outpacing the best stock Supra at 7:52.17 by nearly half a minute. The M2’s additional 463 pounds and wider track are offset by a tidal wave of torque and a chassis that, especially when modified, shrugs off its mass through immense grip and stability at triple-digit speeds. Here, the Supra’s lighter, more agile nature is hampered by a deficit in outright firepower and stability through the fastest sections—the M2 simply devours the straights and high-speed sweepers with less drama.
But the story changes as the track tightens and the rhythm becomes more technical. At Willow Springs Streets, a circuit that rewards rotation and rapid weight transfer, the Supra clocks a 1:17.225 (medium mods, 503 PS), while the best M2 G87 lap trails at 1:25.3 (stock). That’s not just a function of power-to-weight or setup—it’s a reflection of how the Supra’s shorter wheelbase, more communicative chassis, and lower inertia let skilled drivers extract every last tenth. The Supra’s steering, though electrically assisted, offers a directness and feedback rarely found in modern coupes; its balance on the limit is progressive, letting you play with slip angles and manipulate the car with small, precise inputs. For the driver who wants to dance on the edge, the Supra is an open invitation.
Yet, the M2 is never far behind, and on circuits that combine high-speed sections with hard braking zones, its strengths reassert themselves. At Road America, the M2 G87, even on street tires, storms to a 2:11.758 (heavy mods), a staggering 20 seconds ahead of the Supra’s best 2:31.54 (medium mods, similar tires). Here, BMW’s approach—an abundance of power, tire, and braking—translates into confidence-inspiring performance down the straights and through the big stops, even if the car never quite disappears beneath you the way the Supra can in a fast transition. The M2’s electronics and suspension tuning work overtime to mask its weight, but the car always feels like it’s negotiating with physics rather than outsmarting it.
What’s most revealing is how each car responds to modification. The Supra community has developed a dizzying array of upgrades—coils, aero, turbo kits—that can transform the car into a lap-time hunter. Its relatively simple architecture and lighter curb weight mean gains are tangible and easy to exploit, especially for experienced drivers who thrive on setup nuance. The M2, meanwhile, seems to demand a heavier hand: big wheels, serious cooling, and chassis reinforcements are almost prerequisites if you want to run at the front. When built to the hilt, the M2 is relentless, but it’s also more intimidating, less forgiving of mistakes, and more physically taxing over a session.
Ultimately, the Supra is a car that rewards the patient, the precise, and the curious—a tool for the driver who wants to learn the nuances of weight transfer and grip. The M2 G87 is for those who crave speed in broad brushstrokes, who want to feel the might of a modern M car unleashed, and who have the discipline to tame its mass. Track selection becomes the decider: on expansive, high-speed venues, the M2 will almost always find daylight; on technical, mid-speed circuits, the Supra’s clarity and agility let it punch well above its weight. Both are rewarding, but in very different languages—one whispers, the other shouts, and the stopwatch, as always, is only part of the story.
Specifications
| Specifications | Toyota GR Supra A90/A91 GR Supra A90/A91 | BMW M2 G87 M2 G87 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2019-2026 | 2023-2025 |
| horsepower | 387 | 453 |
| torque (N_M) | 500 | 550 |
| forced Induction | Yes | Yes |
| weight (KG) | 1,520 | 1,730 |
| Power to Weight | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| Rank | #89 | #105 |
| Tire |
300 PILOT SUPER SPORT
255/35/19 / 275/35/19 |
300 PILOT SPORT 4S
275/30/19 / 285/30/20 |
| engine Description | 2,998 cc (2.998 L; 182.9 cu in) BMW B58B30O1 I6 | 3.0 L S58B30T0 twin-turbocharged I6 |
| gearbox | 8-SPEED ZF 8HP AUTOMATIC | 6 SPEED MANUAL |
| drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2469 | 2746 |
| width (MM) | 1864 | 1887 |
| length (MM) | 4379 | 4572 |
| height (MM) | 1295 | 1402 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 4 SECs | 3.5 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 249 | 285 |
| price MSRP | $ 55,250 | $ 63,195 |
| Current Value | $ 52,000 | $ 70,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | -5.58s | -4.76s |
Toyota GR Supra A90/A91 GR Supra A90/A91 — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | GR Supra A90/A91 GR Supra A... | M2 G87 M2 G87 | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laguna Seca (Current) | 1:37.76 | 1:39.39 | -1.63 | Light | 141–200 | |
| Ridge Motorsports Park (Current) | 1:44.98 | 1:45.05 | -0.07 | Medium | 141–200 | |
| Thunderhill (East 3 Mile w/ Bypass) | 1:55.61 | 1:57.16 | -1.55 | Medium | 141–200 | |
| Nürburgring (Nordschleife) | 7:52.17 | 7:38.706 | +13.46 | Stock | >200 | |
| Buttonwillow Raceway (13CW) | 1:52 | 1:54.12 | -2.12 | Medium | 141–200 | |
| Eagles Canyon Raceway (2.7 miles CCW) | 2:04.38 | 2:03.5 | +0.88 | Medium | 141–200 | |
| Thunderhill (West) | 1:21.3 | 1:25.398 | -4.09 | Medium | 141–200 | |
| Willow Springs Raceway (Big Willow) | 1:19.58 | 1:30.9 | -11.32 | Heavy | 0–99 | |
| Virginia International Raceway - VIR (Full Course) | 1:59.71 | 2:02.78 | -3.07 | Medium | 141–200 | |
| Sandown International Motor Raceway (CCW) | 1:19.06 | 1:20.86 | -1.8 | Medium | 141–200 | |
| Circuit de Nevers Magny-Cours (CW) | 1:22.955 | 1:21.68 | +1.27 | Stock | >200 | |
| INTa Circuit (CW) | 1:22.09 | 1:22.61 | -0.52 | Stock | >200 | |
| Kinnekulle Ring (CW) | 0:59.4 | 0:57.73 | +1.67 | Medium | 141–200 |