++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The Porsche 981 Cayman S is faster — 9.5s quicker on average across 9 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | Ford Mustang EcoBoost Mustang EcoBoost | Porsche 981 Cayman S 981 Cayman S |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2015-2022 | 2013-2016 |
| horsepower | 310 | 325 |
| torque (N_M) | 407 | 369 |
| weight (KG) | 1,597 | 1,320 |
| Power to Weight | 0.19 | 0.25 |
| Rank | #209 | #130 |
| Tire |
220 P-ZERO NERO
255/40/19 |
220 P-ZERO
235/40/19 / 265/40/19 |
| engine Description | 2.3L turbo I4 (EcoBoost) | 3.4L NA flat-6 (MA1) |
| gearbox | 6-SPEED MANUAL | 6-SPEED MANUAL |
| drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2720 | 2474 |
| width (MM) | 1916 | 1801 |
| length (MM) | 4784 | 4379 |
| height (MM) | 1381 | 1295 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 5.5 SECs | 5 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 233 | 283 |
| price MSRP | $ 32,250 | $ 64,750 |
| Current Value | $ 19,000 | $ 55,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | +4.38s | -1.92s |
Ford Mustang EcoBoost Mustang EcoBoost — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | Mustang EcoBoost Mustang… | 981 Cayman S 981 Caym… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buttonwillow Raceway (13CW) | 2:06 | 1:59.6 | +6.4 | Heavy / Med | 200 / 200 | |
| Auto Club Speedway (Road Course) | 1:53 | 1:53.6 | -0.6 | Stock / Med | 180 / 200 |
Compare to
Comments