++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The Honda Acura NSX NA1 is faster — 2s quicker on average across 13 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | Honda Acura NSX NA1 Acura NSX NA1 | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 9 Lancer Evolution 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 1991-1995 | 2005-2007 |
| horsepower | 270 | 286 |
| torque (N_M) | 285 | 392 |
| weight (KG) | 1,370 | 1,440 |
| Power to Weight | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Rank | #172 | #164 |
| Tire | 200 ADVAN A052 |
180 A13C
235/45/17 |
| engine Description | 3.0L NA V6 (C30A ) | 2.0L turbo I4 (4G63) |
| gearbox | 5-SPEED MANUAL | 5-SPEED MANUAL |
| drive Type | RWD | AWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2530 | 2624 |
| width (MM) | 1810 | 1770 |
| length (MM) | 4425 | 4491 |
| height (MM) | 1170 | 1450 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 5.6 SECs | 6 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 270 | 245 |
| price MSRP | $ 124,104 | $ 37,000 |
| Current Value | $ 100,000 | $ 65,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | -2.26s | -5.83s |
Honda Acura NSX NA1 Acura NSX NA1 — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | Acura NSX NA1 Acura NS… | Lancer Evolution 9 Lancer E… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonoma Raceway (Long Pre 2024) | 1:52.8 | 1:50.29 | +2.51 | Heavy / Med | 200 / 180 | |
| Buttonwillow Raceway (13CW) | 1:57.22 | 1:47.425 | +9.79 | Med / Stock | 100 / 80 | |
| Autodromo Enzo e Dino Ferrari-Imola Circuit (CCW) | 1:59.18 | 1:59.492 | -0.31 | Race / Med | 100 / 200 | |
| Misano World Circuit Marco Simoncelli (GP CW) | 1:43.082 | 1:52.117 | -9.03 | Race / Med | 1 / 200 | |
| Autodromo di Franciacorta (Full CW) | 1:15.897 | 1:16.209 | -0.31 | Race / Heavy | 100 / 200 | |
| Laguna Seca (Pre 2023) | 1:42.55 | 1:43.2 | -0.65 | Heavy / Light | 200 / 180 |
Compare to
Comments