++USER.ALIAS++ ++CREATED_AT++
++COMMENT++
Which is faster?

The BMW E92 M3 is faster — 3.4s quicker on average across 21 shared tracks.

Specifications

Specifications BMW E92 M3 E92 M3 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X GSR Lancer Evolution X GSR
Model Years 2007-2013 2008-2016
horsepower 414 303
torque (N_M) 400 414
weight (KG) 1,605 1,600
Power to Weight 0.26 0.19
Rank #78 -
Tire 280 CONTISPORTCONTACT 3
265/35/19
180 A13C
245/40/18
engine Description 4.0L NA V8 (S65 ) 1998cc in-line 4cyl, turbocharged
gearbox MANUAL 6-SPEED 5-SPEED MANUAL
drive Type RWD AWD
wheelbase (MM) 2761 2649
width (MM) 1804 1811
length (MM) 4615 4496
height (MM) 1424 1481
0 - 60 MPH 5 SECs 5 SECs
top Speed (KPH) 249 235
price MSRP $ 61,000 $ 38,805
Current Value $ 40,000 $ 45,000
OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES -3.13s -1.08s

BMW E92 M3 E92 M3 — Lap Times vs Average

Treadwear/MOD LEVEL Stock/Light S/L Medium Med Heavy/Race H/R
>200 +2.13s -0.28s -3.42s
141–200 -0.38s -2.61s -7.93s
100–140 -0.38s -2.61s -8.22s
0–99 -5.9s -8.51s

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X GSR Lancer Evolution X GSR — Lap Times vs Average

Treadwear/MOD LEVEL Stock/Light S/L Medium Med Heavy/Race H/R
>200
141–200 +10.73s +3.18s -6.41s
100–140 +5.64s -1.23s -10.13s
0–99 -10.13s
Comments
outlined_flag Report Issues