++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The Renault Clio IV RS 200 Sport is faster — 5.2s quicker on average across 4 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | BMW E36 328i E36 328i | Renault Clio IV RS 200 Sport Clio IV RS 200 Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 1993-1999 | 2013-2018 |
| horsepower | 193 | 197 |
| torque (N_M) | 279 | 259 |
| weight (KG) | 1,395 | 1,218 |
| Power to Weight | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Rank | #314 | #308 |
| Tire |
180 P600
235/60/15 |
240 SPORT MAXX RT
205/45/17 |
| engine Description | 2.8L NA I6 (M52B28 ) | 1.6L turbo I4 (Renault) |
| gearbox | 5-SPEED MANUAL | 6-SPEED MANUAL |
| drive Type | RWD | FWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2700 | 2588 |
| width (MM) | 1710 | 1732 |
| length (MM) | 4433 | 4089 |
| height (MM) | 1366 | 1448 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 7 SECs | 6.7 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 237 | 225 |
| price MSRP | $ 41,500 | 24,950 € |
| Current Value | $ 12,000 | $ 14,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | +5.67s | +5.18s |
BMW E36 328i E36 328i — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | E36 328i E36 328i | Clio IV RS 200 Sport Clio IV… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circuito del Jarama (CW) | 1:57.47 | 2:00.54 | -3.07 | Race / Med | 220 / 220 | |
| Aldo Scribante Raceway (Full) | 1:24.16 | 1:20.1 | +4.06 | Stock / Light | 180 / 240 |
Compare to
Comments