The Nissan GT-R R35 is faster — 10.6s quicker on average across 11 shared tracks.
Nissan GT-R R35 vs BMW M5 F90: Performance Data, Lap Times & Ownership Insights
When two titans like the Nissan GT-R R35 and BMW M5 F90 meet at the track, expectations run high—not only for raw speed, but also for the character each brings to the circuit. Both are heavyweights in the world of high-performance AWD, yet their engineering philosophies, market positioning, and on-track behavior diverge in fascinating ways. Let’s dive into the numbers, the experience, and what they mean for drivers who choose one over the other.
Lap Time Showdown: Data-Driven Domination
LapMeta’s extensive database leaves no room for guesswork: the Nissan GT-R R35 emerges as the more consistent track weapon across almost every venue. At the legendary Nürburgring Nordschleife, the GT-R R35’s best stock lap of 7:24.22 decisively trumps the M5 F90’s 7:38.92—a gap of 14.7 seconds, which on this 20km circuit is an eternity. Even when the GT-R R35 is in stock form, its focused engineering and lighter weight (3829 lbs vs. 4345 lbs) pay dividends.
When the tracks tighten and technicality matters, the trend continues. At Snetterton Circuit - 300, a 1:58.53 from a race-prepped GT-R stands 16.09 seconds clear of the M5’s 2:14.62. Even in less modified, stock form on Le Mans - Bugatti, the GT-R R35’s 1:51.35 edges out the M5’s 1:55.2 by nearly four seconds.
However, the M5 F90 isn’t always left in the GT-R’s wake. At Toronto Motorsports Park - CW, the BMW delivers a surprising upset: its stock 1:17.5 bests the GT-R’s 1:19.2 (lightly modified) by 1.7 seconds. This exception underlines the M5’s ability to leverage its prodigious torque (749.77 Nm) and intelligent AWD on shorter, power-centric circuits.
Engineering DNA: Purpose-Built Warrior vs. All-Weather Sledgehammer
The Nissan GT-R R35 is a purpose-built performance machine—its 3.8L twin-turbo V6 may be down on displacement compared to the M5’s 4.4L V8, but it deploys power with surgical precision. Its 545 PS and near-telepathic AWD system make it a formidable track day tool from day one. The GT-R’s lower curb weight and front-mid engine layout give it a more neutral, agile feel when hunting apexes, and its -1.27% overall pace advantage over the LapMeta field confirms its relentless consistency.
Contrast that with the BMW M5 F90. While heavier and more comfort-oriented, the M5’s 600 PS and a staggering 749.77 Nm of torque make it a sledgehammer on straights. Its AWD system, while less track-focused than the GT-R’s, allows for controlled but playful oversteer. The M5 F90’s greatest asset may be its duality: it’s a business suit that hides a roll cage underneath, capable of embarrassing many dedicated sports cars when called upon—especially in short bursts or lower-grip conditions.
Ownership Experience: Value, Versatility, and the Enthusiast’s Dilemma
For the track purist, the GT-R R35 is a “stock hero”—even without modification, it’s a world-beater that needs little to become truly formidable. Its MSRP was originally competitive in the supercar-killer league, but rising used values reflect just how coveted its blend of analog feel and digital sophistication remains. Modifications can unlock further potential, but even in stock trim, its lap times put many exotics to shame.
The BMW M5 F90, meanwhile, is the consummate all-rounder. Its luxury, tech, and daily usability are unmatched by the GT-R, making it the ideal choice for those who want one car to do it all. While its MSRP is higher and depreciation can be steeper, the value proposition for an M5 lies in its ability to cover ground with staggering pace while delivering five-star comfort. For the enthusiast who wants to arrive at the track after a three-hour highway cruise—then lay down a hot lap without breaking a sweat—the M5 F90 is unmatched.
In summary, the Nissan GT-R R35 is the scalpel: sharp, focused, and devastatingly effective at the limit. The BMW M5 F90 is a sledgehammer with a silk handle: brutally quick, but wrapped in refinement. Your choice hinges on whether you want to chase lap records or enjoy all-weather speed and luxury—either way, you’re driving a modern classic.
Specifications
| Specifications | Nissan GT-R R35 GT-R R35 | BMW M5 F90 M5 F90 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2007-2020 | 2018-2023 |
| horsepower | 545 | 600 |
| torque (N_M) | 628 | 750 |
| forced Induction | Yes | Yes |
| weight (KG) | 1,737 | 1,971 |
| Power to Weight | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| Rank | #69 | #84 |
| Tire |
200 SP SPORT 600 DSST
255/40/20 |
240 ADVAN SPORT V105
275/40/19 / 285/40/19 |
| engine Description | 3.8L twin-turbo V6 (VR38DETT) | 4.4 L S63 twin-turbo V8 |
| gearbox | 6-SPEED AUTOMATED SEQUENTIAL TRANSMISSION WITH MANUAL MODE | 8-SPEED ZF GA8HP75Z AUTOMATIC |
| drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2779 | 2982 |
| width (MM) | 1895 | 1902 |
| length (MM) | 4671 | 4989 |
| height (MM) | 1369 | 1473 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 3 SECs | 3 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 315 | 306 |
| price MSRP | $ 113,540 | $ 105,495 |
| Current Value | $ 95,000 | $ 75,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | -6.03s | -0.34s |
Nissan GT-R R35 GT-R R35 — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | GT-R R35 GT-R R35 | M5 F90 M5 F90 | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nürburgring (BTG) | 7:11 | 7:32.59 | -21.59 | Race / Med | 1 / 180 | |
| Nürburgring (Nordschleife) | 7:24.22 | 7:38.92 | -14.7 | Stock / Stock | 200 / 240 | |
| Virginia International Raceway - VIR (Grand West Course) | 2:43.5 | 2:55.2 | -11.7 | Heavy / Stock | 40 / 300 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Toronto Motorsports Park (CW) | 1:19.2 | 1:17.5 | +1.7 | Light / Stock | 200 / 300 | |
| Autodromo Vallelunga Piero Taruffi-ACI Vallelunga (CW) | 1:43.7 | 1:51.04 | -7.34 | Med / Stock | 100 / 240 | |
| Le Mans (Bugatti) | 1:51.35 | 1:55.2 | -3.85 | Stock / Stock | 200 / 240 | |
| Sachsenring (CCW) | 1:33.87 | 1:34.36 | -0.49 | Stock / Stock | 200 / 240 | |
| Sepang International Circuit (GP circuit CW) | 2:20.57 | 2:28.23 | -7.66 | Med / Light | 1 / 300 |