++USER.ALIAS++ ++CREATED_AT++
++COMMENT++

On paper, the Toyota GR Supra A90/A91 and BMW M2 G87 are siblings—both powered by a 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six, both rear-wheel drive, both conceived with track days and fast road work in mind. Yet, their shared DNA only underscores the divergent philosophies at play when you push each car to its limits. The Supra is the scalpel: lightweight, sharp, and engineered to reward the thoughtful driver. The M2 G87, in contrast, is a sledgehammer of the modern M ethos—a heavier, more powerful brute, bristling with technology and torque, determined to dominate through sheer force.

This divergence becomes immediately apparent in the data. Consider the Nürburgring Nordschleife, the ultimate test of chassis, composure, and power deployment. The M2 G87, with its 453 PS S58 engine and a raft of upgrades, delivers a blistering 7:23.16, outpacing the best stock Supra at 7:52.17 by nearly half a minute. The M2’s additional 463 pounds and wider track are offset by a tidal wave of torque and a chassis that, especially when modified, shrugs off its mass through immense grip and stability at triple-digit speeds. Here, the Supra’s lighter, more agile nature is hampered by a deficit in outright firepower and stability through the fastest sections—the M2 simply devours the straights and high-speed sweepers with less drama.

But the story changes as the track tightens and the rhythm becomes more technical. At Willow Springs Streets, a circuit that rewards rotation and rapid weight transfer, the Supra clocks a 1:17.225 (medium mods, 503 PS), while the best M2 G87 lap trails at 1:25.3 (stock). That’s not just a function of power-to-weight or setup—it’s a reflection of how the Supra’s shorter wheelbase, more communicative chassis, and lower inertia let skilled drivers extract every last tenth. The Supra’s steering, though electrically assisted, offers a directness and feedback rarely found in modern coupes; its balance on the limit is progressive, letting you play with slip angles and manipulate the car with small, precise inputs. For the driver who wants to dance on the edge, the Supra is an open invitation.

Yet, the M2 is never far behind, and on circuits that combine high-speed sections with hard braking zones, its strengths reassert themselves. At Road America, the M2 G87, even on street tires, storms to a 2:11.758 (heavy mods), a staggering 20 seconds ahead of the Supra’s best 2:31.54 (medium mods, similar tires). Here, BMW’s approach—an abundance of power, tire, and braking—translates into confidence-inspiring performance down the straights and through the big stops, even if the car never quite disappears beneath you the way the Supra can in a fast transition. The M2’s electronics and suspension tuning work overtime to mask its weight, but the car always feels like it’s negotiating with physics rather than outsmarting it.

What’s most revealing is how each car responds to modification. The Supra community has developed a dizzying array of upgrades—coils, aero, turbo kits—that can transform the car into a lap-time hunter. Its relatively simple architecture and lighter curb weight mean gains are tangible and easy to exploit, especially for experienced drivers who thrive on setup nuance. The M2, meanwhile, seems to demand a heavier hand: big wheels, serious cooling, and chassis reinforcements are almost prerequisites if you want to run at the front. When built to the hilt, the M2 is relentless, but it’s also more intimidating, less forgiving of mistakes, and more physically taxing over a session.

Ultimately, the Supra is a car that rewards the patient, the precise, and the curious—a tool for the driver who wants to learn the nuances of weight transfer and grip. The M2 G87 is for those who crave speed in broad brushstrokes, who want to feel the might of a modern M car unleashed, and who have the discipline to tame its mass. Track selection becomes the decider: on expansive, high-speed venues, the M2 will almost always find daylight; on technical, mid-speed circuits, the Supra’s clarity and agility let it punch well above its weight. Both are rewarding, but in very different languages—one whispers, the other shouts, and the stopwatch, as always, is only part of the story.

Last updated: Mar 6, 2026

Specifications

Specifications Toyota GR Supra A90/A91 GR Supra A90/A91 BMW M2 G87 M2 G87
Model Years 2019-2026 2023-2025
horsepower 387 453
torque (N_M) 500 550
forced Induction Yes Yes
weight (KG) 1,520 1,730
Power to Weight 0.25 0.26
Rank #89 #105
Tire 300 PILOT SUPER SPORT
255/35/19 / 275/35/19
300 PILOT SPORT 4S
275/30/19 / 285/30/20
engine Description 2,998 cc (2.998 L; 182.9 cu in) BMW B58B30O1 I6 3.0 L S58B30T0 twin-turbocharged I6
gearbox 8-SPEED ZF 8HP AUTOMATIC 6 SPEED MANUAL
drive Type RWD RWD
wheelbase (MM) 2469 2746
width (MM) 1864 1887
length (MM) 4379 4572
height (MM) 1295 1402
0 - 60 MPH 4 SECs 3.5 SECs
top Speed (KPH) 249 285
price MSRP $ 55,250 $ 63,195
Current Value $ 52,000 $ 70,000
OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES -5.58s -4.76s

Toyota GR Supra A90/A91 GR Supra A90/A91 — Lap Times vs Average

Treadwear/MOD LEVEL Stock/Light S/L Medium Med Heavy/Race H/R
>200 +0.9s -2.67s -7.67s
141–200 -1.26s -4.84s -9.75s
100–140 -3.21s -6.17s -9.85s
0–99 -3.79s -6.25s -12.39s

BMW M2 G87 M2 G87 — Lap Times vs Average

Treadwear/MOD LEVEL Stock/Light S/L Medium Med Heavy/Race H/R
>200 +0.02s -3.13s
141–200 -0.47s -3.78s -9.36s
100–140 -3.78s -9.36s
0–99 -9.16s -9.36s

Additional Lap Times

Track Name GR Supra A90/A91 M2 G87 Diff Mod Treadwear TW Video
Laguna Seca (Current) 1:30.18 1:35.33 -5.15 Heavy / Med 200 / 200 VS
Ridge Motorsports Park (Current) 1:39.06 1:41.025 -1.96 Race / Heavy 100 / 40
Thunderhill (East 3 Mile w/ Bypass) 1:49.6 1:57.16 -7.56 Heavy / Med 200 / 200
Nürburgring (BTG) 8:03 7:21.82 +41.18 Stock / Heavy 300 / 200
Nürburgring (Nordschleife) 7:52.17 7:23.16 +29.01 Stock / Med 300 / 200
Road Atlanta (Current) 1:25.8 1:39.4 -13.6 Race / Stock 200 / 220
Sebring (CW) 2:24.4 2:22.71 +1.69 Med / Light 300 / 200
Summit Point Motorsports Park (Main) 1:13.7 1:20.6 -6.9 Heavy / Stock 40 / 300
Lime Rock Park (CW) 0:55.2 0:55.621 -0.42 Heavy / Race 200 / 200
Buttonwillow Raceway (13CW) 1:47.4 1:54.12 -6.72 Heavy / Med 200 / 200
Motorsport Ranch-MSR Cresson (1.7 CCW) 1:18.67 1:20.1 -1.43 Stock / Light 300 / 200
Harris Hill Raceway (CW) 1:23.1 1:21.28 +1.82 Med / Med 300 / 100
Eagles Canyon Raceway (2.7 miles CCW) 2:04.38 2:04.8 -0.42 Med / Light 200 / 200
Autobahn Country Club (South Circuit) 1:33.68 1:32.285 +1.39 Stock / Light 300 / 300
Thunderhill (West) 1:21.059 1:24.12 -3.06 Med / Stock 100 / 300
Thunderhill (CW) 1:21.24 1:27.15 -5.91 Med / Light 100 / 300
Willow Springs Raceway (Streets) 1:17.225 1:25.3 -8.07 Heavy / Stock 200 / 300
Putnam Park Road Course (Long Course CW) 1:08.017 1:15.61 -7.59 Heavy / Light 200 / 300
Willow Springs Raceway (Big Willow) 1:23.137 1:30.9 -7.76 Heavy / Heavy 200 / 40
Carolina Motorsports Park (Full) 1:34.12 1:34.183 -0.06 Heavy / Race 200 / 200
Virginia International Raceway - VIR (Full Course) 1:53.288 2:02.78 -9.49 Heavy / Med 40 / 200
Club Motorsports (CW) 1:41.7 1:42.84 -1.14 Stock / Stock 300 / 200
Mugello Circuit (GP Course CW) 2:04.4 1:56.92 +7.48 Med / Med 200 / 60
Korea International Circuit-Yeongam (National Circuit) 1:17.6 1:24.65 -7.05 Med / Med 40 / 200
Sonoma Raceway (Full) 1:40.737 1:49.39 -8.65 Heavy / Med 200 / 200
Dunnville Autodrome (CW) 1:15.06 1:11.19 +3.87 Stock / Stock 300 / 180
Gelleråsen Arena (GP) 1:12.231 1:10.8 +1.43 Med / Heavy 300 / 200
Batangas Racing Circuit (CW) 1:40.2 1:47.26 -7.06 Race / Stock 200 / 300
Tor Modlin (CCW) 1:03.62 1:07.1 -3.48 Light / Stock 100 / 300
Sonoma Raceway (Long) 1:39.2 1:45.5 -6.3 Heavy / Light 200 / 200
Buttonwillow Raceway (Circuit) 1:56.158 1:58.74 -2.58 Med / Light 300 / 300
Comments
outlined_flag Report Wrong Data