++USER.ALIAS++ ++CREATED_AT++
++COMMENT++
Which is faster?

The Nissan GT-R R35 is faster — 9.8s quicker on average across 41 shared tracks.

Nissan GT-R R35 vs Honda Civic Type R FL5: Track Titans, Two Worlds Apart

When it comes to modern performance icons, few names stir such instant recognition as the Nissan GT-R R35 and the Honda Civic Type R FL5. Yet these two Japanese legends could hardly be more different in their philosophies, engineering, and track behavior. Thanks to a wealth of lap data from LapMeta.com, we can move beyond reputation and get to the heart of how these machines really stack up, both in the stopwatch wars and in the eyes of the enthusiast.

Performance Data and Lap Time Showdown

At first glance, the GT-R R35 seems to play in a different league. With a hefty 545 PS on tap, 627.74 Nm of torque, and a curb weight of 3829 lbs, the Nissan is a technological tour de force, powered by its legendary 3.8L twin-turbo V6 and all-wheel drive. The Civic Type R FL5, meanwhile, is the latest in Honda’s hot hatch dynasty, wielding 315 PS, 420.3 Nm, and a svelte 3188 lbs, driven exclusively by the front wheels with its razor-sharp 2.0-liter turbo four.

This difference in intent is reflected in the lap times. Across a diverse range of tracks—fast, technical, old-world, and modern—the R35 consistently holds a double-digit advantage. On the fearsome Nürburgring Nordschleife, for example, both cars ran stock: the GT-R clocked a 7:24.22, outpacing the FL5’s 7:44.881 by over 20 seconds—a gap that’s a lifetime on the world’s most demanding circuit.

This gulf is repeated at Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps, where the GT-R’s 2:32 (heavy mod) trounces the Civic’s 2:52.04 (light mod) by 20 seconds. Even at more technical North American tracks like Laguna Seca and Buttonwillow Raceway, the GT-R stretches an advantage of nearly 11 seconds.

Yet, the Civic Type R FL5 is no track day pushover. At the challenging NCCAR - Road Course, the Honda (with medium mods) delivered a 1:31.79 to nip the GT-R’s stock 1:33.3 by 1.51 seconds—a rare but telling win for the front-driver. This suggests that on tight, technical circuits where outright power and AWD traction are less decisive, the FL5 can punch above its weight, especially when lightly modified.

Engineering Philosophies and Driving Experience

The R35 GT-R is born of Nissan’s relentless pursuit of speed through technology. Its AWD system, sophisticated electronics, and turbocharged muscle make it as much a computer-assisted missile as a traditional sports car. The result: devastating acceleration, unflappable corner exit, and a sense of brute force that can flatten lap records in the hands of both expert and intermediate drivers. It’s not just fast—it’s forgiving, and its -1.26% overall pace vs average shows it’s consistently ahead of the curve.

In contrast, the Civic Type R FL5 is all about driver involvement and efficiency. Its clever suspension geometry, limited-slip differential, and featherweight build turn front-wheel drive from a liability into a weapon. While it can’t match the GT-R’s power or launch, its agility and precision let skilled drivers extract every last tenth, especially in environments where nimbleness and consistency matter more than brute speed. Its -0.68% pace vs average is a testament to its effectiveness as a true giant-killer in the right hands.

Value, Ownership, and the Enthusiast Perspective

Value is not just about lap times—it’s about what those numbers mean to the owner. The GT-R R35, with an original MSRP well north of $100,000 (and often trading for more), is a supercar for those who want supercar performance without the badge snobbery. Its complex engineering and running costs are not for the faint-hearted, but few cars offer so much performance with such all-weather usability and modding potential. Stock, it’s already a world-beater; with modifications, it becomes a track day sledgehammer.

The Civic Type R FL5, meanwhile, is a democratizer of speed. Priced around $44,000 at launch (though current market premiums may apply), it puts near-exotic lap times within reach of the everyman. Its running costs, reliability, and practicality make it a compelling choice for the track enthusiast who needs a daily driver—or simply prefers to wring the neck of a lighter, simpler machine. While the GT-R is a fast car made super fast through mods, the FL5 is all about extracting the sublime from simplicity and clever engineering.

In the end, the LapMeta data tells a clear story: the GT-R R35 is the reigning king of outright pace, but the Civic Type R FL5 is the people’s champion, a car that can occasionally outfox giants and always rewards skill and commitment. Both are legends—just with very different ideas of what makes a lap truly great.

Last updated: Jun 6, 2026

Specifications

Specifications Nissan GT-R R35 GT-R R35 Honda Civic Type R FL5 Civic Type R FL5
Model Years 2007-2020 2023-2025
horsepower 545 315
torque (N_M) 628 420
forced Induction Yes Yes
weight (KG) 1,737 1,446
Power to Weight 0.31 0.22
Rank #81 #160
Tire 200 SP SPORT 600 DSST
255/40/20
300 PILOT SPORT 4S
265/30/19
engine Description 3.8L twin-turbo V6 (VR38DETT) 2.0-liter turbocharged inline-4 (K20C1)
gearbox 6-SPEED AUTOMATED SEQUENTIAL TRANSMISSION WITH MANUAL MODE 6-SPEED MANUAL WITH REV-MATCHING
drive Type AWD FWD
wheelbase (MM) 2779 2736
width (MM) 1895 1890
length (MM) 4671 4547
height (MM) 1369 1407
0 - 60 MPH 3 SECs 5 SECs
top Speed (KPH) 315 272
price MSRP $ 113,540 $ 38,000
Current Value $ 95,000 $ 49,000
OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES -5.83s -0.09s

Nissan GT-R R35 GT-R R35 — Lap Times vs Average

Treadwear/MOD LEVEL Stock/Light S/L Medium Med Heavy/Race H/R
>200 -0.93s -8.56s
141–200 -2.3s -8.56s -8.56s
100–140 -2.3s -8.56s -9.12s
0–99 -6.15s -8.56s -11.59s

Honda Civic Type R FL5 Civic Type R FL5 — Lap Times vs Average

Treadwear/MOD LEVEL Stock/Light S/L Medium Med Heavy/Race H/R
>200 +1.13s -0.61s -0.72s
141–200 +1.13s -1.14s -3.74s
100–140 +0.58s -1.14s
0–99

Additional Lap Times

Track Name GT-R R35 GT-R R35 Civic Type R FL5 Civic Ty… Diff Mod Treadwear TW Video
Laguna Seca (Current) 1:27.269 1:38.06 -10.79 Race / Light 40 / 180 VS
Thunderhill (East 3 Mile w/ Bypass) 1:48.829 1:58.54 -9.71 Race / Med 40 / 200
Nürburgring (BTG) 7:11 7:44.13 -33.13 Race / Stock 1 / 300
Nürburgring (Nordschleife) 7:20.61 7:44.881 -24.27 Heavy / Stock 200 / 300
Virginia International Raceway - VIR (Grand West Course) 2:43.5 3:00.73 -17.23 Heavy / Stock 40 / 300 VS
Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps (SPA) 2:32 2:52.04 -20.04 Heavy / Light 200 / 200
Barber Motorsports Park (CW) 1:35.34 1:40.9 -5.56 Med / Light 40 / 140 VS
Pacific Raceways (CCW) 1:33.8 1:34.33 -0.53 Light / Med 200 / 200
Road Atlanta (Current) 1:23.8 1:37.2 -13.4 Race / Light 1 / 200 VS
Mount Panorama Racing Circuit - Bathurst (CCW) 2:11.5 2:27 -15.5 Race / Light 200 / 200
New Jersey Motorsports Park-NJMP (Lightning) 1:11 1:14.93 -3.93 Med / Light 100 / 200
Sydney Motorsport Park (GP Circuit) 1:36.3 1:39.07 -2.77 Race / Heavy 1 / 200
Buttonwillow Raceway (13CW) 1:46.3 1:57.01 -10.71 Race / Med 40 / 220 VS
Harris Hill Raceway (CW) 1:23.69 1:26.07 -2.38 Med / Stock 200 / 200 VS
Willow Springs Raceway (Streets) 1:19.58 1:21.86 -2.28 Med / Light 100 / 200 VS
Pittsburgh International Race Complex - PittRace (Full Course) 1:42.2 1:55.6 -13.4 Heavy / Heavy 40 / 200
Carolina Motorsports Park (Full) 1:39.89 1:48.51 -8.62 Med / Med 200 / 100 VS
NCCAR (Road Course CCW) 1:33.3 1:31.79 +1.51 Stock / Med 200 / 200
Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course (Club Circuit) 1:37.98 1:38.97 -0.99 Med / Light 200 / 140 VS
Virginia International Raceway - VIR (Full Course) 1:48.7 2:07.76 -19.06 Heavy / Med 40 / 200 VS
Phillip Island Grand Prix Circuit (CCW) 1:39 1:51 -12 Heavy / Light 100 / 100
Winton Motor Raceway (National Circuit CW) 1:24 1:33.02 -9.02 Race / Med 1 / 300
Fuji International Speedway (GP Circuit CW) 1:48 1:58.257 -10.25 Race / Light 200 / 200
Le Mans (Bugatti) 1:51.35 1:55.07 -3.72 Stock / Stock 200 / 300
Suzuka Circuit (CW) 2:20 2:27.96 -7.96 Med / Stock 200 / 200 VS
Bedford Autodrome (West) 1:20.1 1:22.96 -2.86 Stock / Stock 200 / 300
Sepang International Circuit (GP circuit CW) 2:20.57 2:31.6 -11.03 Med / Med 1 / 100
Sodegaura Forest Raceway (CW) 1:16.3 1:16.99 -0.69 Stock / Stock 200 / 300
Autódromo Velo Città (CCW) 0:58.181 1:03.887 -5.7 Med / Stock 200 / 300
Sonoma Raceway (Long) 1:37.585 1:50.97 -13.38 Race / Heavy 40 / 200 VS
NCM Motorsports Park-National Corvette Museum (Mulsanne Chicane) 2:04.5 2:21.19 -16.69 Heavy / Light 40 / 140
Comments
Report Issues