Algorithm: Model-Aggregate with Weighted Averaging

Tire Performance Rankings

Per-Model Performance Breakdown for Top Tires in Each Treadwear Category

info About This Report

This report presents tire performance rankings built from real-world track laps in the LapMeta database. Rankings use a margin-based, model-aggregate approach : on every car model, each tire's best laps are compared to the fastest tire on that same model, and those pace gaps are combined across the whole fleet.

Why Model-Aggregate? Unlike simple overall rankings, this approach compares tires only on equal machinery. Each tire is measured by how close it gets to the fastest tire on every car model where both have data — by actual pace margin, not just finishing order — then the margins are aggregated with more weight for well-tested car/tire combinations and statistical shrinkage so thin data cannot buy a podium.

science Methodology

1. Data Quality Filters

Only clean, reliable lap data is used:

  • Dry conditions only (wet laps excluded)
  • Experienced drivers only (novice laps excluded)
  • Clean laps only (flagged laps excluded)
  • Reasonable lap times (outliers removed)
  • Recent data (last 6 years only)
  • Verified setups only

2. Minimum Requirements

To qualify for rankings, each tire must have:

  • 4+ car models — Ensures cross-platform validity
  • 50+ total laps — Provides statistical significance
  • 3+ laps per model — Minimum for reliable average

3. Weighting System

Combined Weight = Model Quality × Tire Data Volume

Weight indicators:

  • High (≥1.0x) Well-tested platform with substantial data
  • Medium (0.5-0.99x) Moderate testing and data volume
  • Low (<0.5x) Limited testing or minimal data
insights How to Interpret Results
  • Overall Rank: Lower is better (1st is best)
  • Car Models Tested: This tire has been tested on X different car models. Rankings reflect weighted average performance across all platforms.
  • Data Quality: Higher lap counts = more reliable data
speed UTQG 99tw Category
#2 A7
Hoosier TW 40 70 Models
+0.00 pace pts behind the leader
Car Models Tested: 70
Laps 256
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
#3 Slicks
Michelin TW 1 54 Models
+0.14 pace pts behind the leader
Car Models Tested: 54
Laps 141
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
Yokohama TW 40 37 Models
+0.22 pace pts behind the leader
Car Models Tested: 37
Laps 91
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
speed UTQG 140tw Category
Maxxis TW 100 33 Models
+0.00 pace pts behind the leader
Car Models Tested: 33
Laps 141
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
Yokohama TW 100 35 Models
+0.01 pace pts behind the leader
Car Models Tested: 35
Laps 64
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
#4 AR-1
Nankang TW 100 113 Models
+0.07 pace pts behind the leader
Car Models Tested: 113
Laps 343
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
speed UTQG 200tw Category
Yokohama TW 200 135 Models
class reference — the fastest tire in this category
Car Models Tested: 135
Laps 622
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
Bridgestone TW 200 135 Models
+0.20 pace pts behind the leader
Car Models Tested: 135
Laps 765
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
Michelin TW 180 133 Models
+0.22 pace pts behind the leader
Car Models Tested: 133
Laps 557
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
speed UTQG 201+tw Category
Michelin TW 300 37 Models
class reference — the fastest tire in this category
Car Models Tested: 37
Laps 149
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
Goodyear TW 220 51 Models
+0.12 pace pts behind the leader
Car Models Tested: 51
Laps 311
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
#3 P-Zero
Pirelli TW 220 52 Models
+0.18 pace pts behind the leader
Car Models Tested: 52
Laps 89
Data Quality: ★★★★★ (Very High)
Report Issues