++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The Mercedes GT R Pro is faster — 0.6s quicker on average across 6 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | Dodge Viper ACR Mk5 Viper ACR Mk5 | Mercedes GT R Pro GT R Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2014-2017 | 2019-2020 |
| horsepower | 645 | 577 |
| torque (N_M) | 813 | 700 |
| weight (KG) | 1,530 | 1,588 |
| Power to Weight | 0.42 | 0.36 |
| Rank | #18 | #20 |
| Tire |
200 ECSTA V720 ACR
295/30/18 |
180 PILOT SPORT CUP 2
275/35/19 / 325/30/20 |
| engine Description | 8.4L NA V10 (Viper Gen 5) | 4.0L twin-turbo DOHC 32-valve V8 |
| gearbox | 6-SPD MAN W/OD TRANSMISSION | 7-SPEED DUAL-CLUTCH AUTOMATIC |
| drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2510 | 2629 |
| width (MM) | 1941 | 2075 |
| length (MM) | 4463 | 4547 |
| height (MM) | 1247 | 1288 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 3.4 SECs | 3.5 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 285 | 319 |
| price MSRP | $ 118,795 | $ 195,000 |
| Current Value | $ 300,000 | $ 165,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | -7.89s | -10s |
Dodge Viper ACR Mk5 Viper ACR Mk5 — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | Viper ACR Mk5 Viper AC… | GT R Pro GT R Pro | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thunderhill (East 3 Mile w/ Bypass) | 1:50.7 | 1:56.3 | -5.6 | Stock | 141–200 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Nürburgring (Nordschleife) | 7:01.3 | 7:04.632 | -3.33 | Stock | 141–200 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Laguna Seca (Pre 2023) | 1:31.58 | 1:34.82 | -3.24 | Stock | 141–200 |
Additional Lap Times
| Track Name | Viper ACR Mk5 Viper AC… | GT R Pro GT R Pro | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thunderhill (East 3 Mile w/ Bypass) | 1:50.7 | 1:55.65 | -4.95 | Stock / Stock | 200 / 80 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Nürburgring (Nordschleife) | 7:01.3 | 7:06.6 | -5.3 | Stock / Med | 200 / 180 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Roebling Road Raceway (Road Course) | 1:11.87 | 1:12.9 | -1.03 | Heavy / Med | 100 / 180 | ▶ VS ▶ |
| Laguna Seca (Pre 2023) | 1:28.65 | 1:34.82 | -6.17 | Race / Stock | 200 / 180 | ▶ VS ▶ |
Compare to
Comments