++COMMENT++
Which is faster?
The BMW E92 M3 is faster — 10.2s quicker on average across 13 shared tracks.
Specifications
| Specifications | BMW E92 M3 E92 M3 | BMW M4 F82 DCT M4 F82 DCT |
|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2007-2013 | 2015-2019 |
| horsepower | 414 | 425 |
| torque (N_M) | 400 | 406 |
| weight (KG) | 1,605 | 1,580 |
| Power to Weight | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| Rank | #78 | - |
| Tire |
280 CONTISPORTCONTACT 3
265/35/19 |
300 PILOT SUPER SPORT
265/30/20 / 285/30/20 |
| engine Description | 4.0L NA V8 (S65 ) | 3.0 L S55 twin-turbo I6 |
| gearbox | MANUAL 6-SPEED | 7-SPEED M-DCT TRANSMISSION |
| drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| wheelbase (MM) | 2761 | 2812 |
| width (MM) | 1804 | 1870 |
| length (MM) | 4615 | 4672 |
| height (MM) | 1424 | 1392 |
| 0 - 60 MPH | 5 SECs | 4 SECs |
| top Speed (KPH) | 249 | 249 |
| price MSRP | $ 61,000 | $ 74,845 |
| Current Value | $ 40,000 | $ 60,000 |
| OVERALL VS AVERAGE LAP TIMES | -3.13s | -3.55s |
BMW E92 M3 E92 M3 — Lap Times vs Average
Lap Times
| Track Name | E92 M3 E92 M3 | M4 F82 DCT M4 F82 D… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonoma Raceway (Long) | 1:45.17 | 1:45.4 | -0.23 | Medium | 141–200 |
Additional Lap Times
| Track Name | E92 M3 E92 M3 | M4 F82 DCT M4 F82 D… | Diff | Mod | Treadwear TW | Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laguna Seca (Current) | 1:32.8 | 1:35.7 | -2.9 | Race / Light | 100 / 200 | |
| Sydney Motorsport Park (GP Circuit) | 1:41.8 | 1:39.35 | +2.45 | Med / Stock | 80 / 300 | |
| Watkins Glen International (Full Circuit w/ Loop) | 2:00.18 | 2:11 | -10.82 | Race / Med | 40 / 300 | |
| Roebling Road Raceway (Road Course) | 1:11.8 | 1:22.33 | -10.53 | Race / Light | 200 / 300 | |
| Sonoma Raceway (Long) | 1:42.3 | 1:45.4 | -3.1 | Race / Med | 200 / 200 |
Compare to
Comments